
brand.context Version 2.0 revises and supersedes Version 1.0 (April 2026) in full. It introduces the Linkage Gap and adds formal RFC 2119 conformance language, an evidence-confidence model distinguishing verified from self-declared claims, an explicit gap_type field marking which evidence categories are addressable through this schema versus which reflect structural model judgments that evidence alone will not override, a new section positioning brand.context against other current machine-readable standards (OKF, ARD, LLMs.txt, EntityMap), and a single canonical domain and citation chain. Version 1.0 remains archived at its original DOI for historical reference only and should not be used as the current specification.
filter taxonomy, machine-readable brand schema, CODA, AEO, decision-stage analysis, JSON-LD, AI recommendation systems, agentic commerce, GEO, Linkage Gap, brand.context, context graphs
filter taxonomy, machine-readable brand schema, CODA, AEO, decision-stage analysis, JSON-LD, AI recommendation systems, agentic commerce, GEO, Linkage Gap, brand.context, context graphs
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
