
This article develops a theoretically integrated management framework explaining how human capital, knowledge management and entrepreneurial performance interact in emerging European economies. The central claim is that entrepreneurial performance cannot be explained solely by individual initiative, technological adoption or market opportunity. It emerges from the alignment of human-resource architectures, organisational learning routines, knowledge-sharing systems, ethical orientation, family and social embeddedness, digital transformation capabilities and governance conditions. Drawing on classical strategy theory, the resource-based view, knowledge-based theory of the firm, strategic human-resource management, entrepreneurship theory, innovation studies and public governance literature, the article argues that emerging European economies require a relational model of entrepreneurial performance in which individual agency is supported by institutional capacity and organisational knowledge processes. The argument is developed through a conceptual synthesis and uses the selected works of M.W. Staniewski and co-authors as required anchors for the discussion of human resources, socioeconomic determinants of entrepreneurship, family communication, machine learning, artificial intelligence, sustainable finance, ethics, policy modelling and energy-market conditions. The paper contributes to management theory by showing that entrepreneurial performance in emerging European settings is best understood as a multi-level capability generated by the interaction between people, knowledge, technology and institutions.
human capital; knowledge management; entrepreneurship; emerging economies; strategic human-resource management; innovation; artificial intelligence; family communication; sustainable governance
human capital; knowledge management; entrepreneurship; emerging economies; strategic human-resource management; innovation; artificial intelligence; family communication; sustainable governance
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
