Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

D3.2 DTO-BioFlow best procedures and practice guidelines

Authors: Pavloudi, Christina; Santi, Ioulia;

D3.2 DTO-BioFlow best procedures and practice guidelines

Abstract

This deliverable (D3.2) is a report on best practice guidelines for standardisation, harmonisation, product generation and data exchange for biodiversity data, focusing in particular on genomic, imaging, biologging and passive acoustic monitoring networks. More specifically, this document aims to describe the data formats used for each of those novel data types, to serve as reference for the data type-specific communities. This document is the fourth deliverable of WP3, following a) “D3.1 DTO-BioFlow data flow blueprint”, which described the envisioned data flows and set up the general framework for data flow towards EDITO for each of the biodiversity data types, b) “D3.3 DTO-BioFlow data product inventory” which presented a summary of available, but yet inaccessible in certain cases, marine biodiversity data, including metadata descriptions, which will be made accessible through data products created within WP3 and c) “D3.4 Biodiversity observation network data online available in the DTO repositories_M20” which was based on D3.3, summarized the standardisation work and the data flow status for each data type and provided links to the published data records in EMODnet Biology. The goal of D3.2 is to compile best practices, guidelines and recommendations for data generation, quality control and formatting to Darwin Core Archives (DwC-A) for subsequent publication to EurOBIS and EMODnet Biology. In the cases where the data types do not allow for formatting to DwC-A, the guidelines and recommendations for direct publication to the EDITO data lake are presented.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Italian National Biodiversity Future Center
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!