Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Effectiveness of Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Contralesional Motor Cortex Combined with Conventional Rehabilitation in Sub-Acute Stroke: A Pilot Study

Authors: Chethan C , Gaurav Goel , Shipra Chaudhary;

Effectiveness of Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Contralesional Motor Cortex Combined with Conventional Rehabilitation in Sub-Acute Stroke: A Pilot Study

Abstract

Background: Upper limb motor impairment persists in up to 80% of stroke survivors and remains one of the most challenging goals in rehabilitation medicine. Low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) applied to the contralesional motor cortex is supported by growing evidence as an adjunct to conventional rehabilitation, yet published data from the Indian subcontinent are sparse. This study describes the application and functional outcomes of 1 Hz rTMS to the contralesional primary motor cortex combined with conventional rehabilitation in five patients with subacute stroke. Methods: Five patients with first-ever, unilateral, subcortical subacute stroke and Brunnstrom Stage 2 – 4 upper limb hemiparesis received low-frequency rTMS (1 Hz, 1,200 pulses/session, 90% resting motor threshold) applied over the contralesional M1, followed immediately by conventional neurological physiotherapy and occupational therapy. Outcomes assessed included the Modified Rankin Scale (mRS), Barthel Index (BI), Functional Independence Measure – Functional Assessment Measure (FIM-FAM), and the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA, total score). Paired t-tests and Wilcoxon Signed-Rank exact tests were performed; effect sizes were computed as Cohen’s d and rank-biserial correlation. Results: All five patients demonstrated consistent improvement across all outcome measures. Mean improvements: mRS −1.0 grade (21.7% reduction); BI +25.0±5.0 points (78.1% increase); FIM-FAM +26.4±5.6 points (21.1% increase); FMA +25.0±2.9 points (36.7% increase). All patients exceeded the Minimum Clinically Important Difference (MCID) for the Barthel Index (≥10 points). Effect sizes were very large (Cohen’s d: BI=5.00, FIM=4.68, FM=8.58; rank-biserial r=1.00 for all scales). No adverse events were recorded. Conclusion: Low-frequency rTMS to contralesional M1 combined with conventional rehabilitation produced clinically meaningful and consistent functional gains across all outcome measures in all five patients with subacute stroke. These preliminary findings support the feasibility and efficacy signal of this approach and provide the impetus for a planned multicentre randomised controlled trial.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!