
Abstract Oral traditions have played a central role in preserving cultural knowledge in many societies. In India, philosophical teachings, sacred texts, chants, rituals, and folk narratives were historically transmitted through oral communication between teachers and learners. The Bhagavad Gita represents a significant example of this tradition because it originated as a spoken dialogue between Lord Krishna and Arjuna and later became a written philosophical text. In the modern digital age, new technologies provide opportunities to record, store, and distribute oral knowledge through digital platforms. However, the digitization of traditional knowledge also raises ethical questions related to authenticity, ownership, cultural sensitivity, and misuse. Existing studies often focus on digital preservation methods but give limited attention to ethical frameworks rooted in Indian philosophical traditions. This paper addresses this research gap by exploring how ethical principles found in the Bhagavad Gita—such as dharma (duty), satya (truth), and responsible action—can guide the digital preservation of oral knowledge. Using a qualitative conceptual research approach, the study examines the intersection of oral traditions, digital documentation, and ethical responsibility. The findings suggest that digital preservation should be guided by culturally sensitive and ethically informed frameworks. The study proposes a model that integrates technological tools with ethical principles from the Indian Knowledge System to ensure responsible and sustainable preservation of oral knowledge.
Bhagavad Gita, Oral Knowledge, Digital Preservation, Indian Knowledge System, Cultural Heritage, Ethics
Bhagavad Gita, Oral Knowledge, Digital Preservation, Indian Knowledge System, Cultural Heritage, Ethics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
