Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Research . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Research . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Digital Necropolitics: Death, Data, and the Erosion of Democratic Accountability in the Age of Algorithmic Governance

Authors: Gogshelidze, Giorgi;

Digital Necropolitics: Death, Data, and the Erosion of Democratic Accountability in the Age of Algorithmic Governance

Abstract

Under algorithmic governance, biological death historically conceptualized as the absolute boundary of civic agency and political subjectivity Is increasingly converted into a permanent informational resource. This paper untangles the conceptual and practical contours of digital necropolitics, tracing how postmortem data is captured, preserved, and financialized within platform capitalism. Drawing on the theoretical interventions of Achille Mbembe, Giorgio Agamben, and Luciano Floridi, the analysis addresses the ontological mutation of the "informational body" and its subsequent vulnerability to necro-authoritarian exploitation, particularly through electoral simulations, behavioral modeling, and the artificial reanimation of ideological remains. By exposing the severe accountability gaps intrinsic to opaque algorithmic mediation, the study argues that reviving democratic vitality requires moving beyond traditional data protection frameworks. Instead, it advocates for the institutionalization of "postmortem citizenship" and a radical, political right to be forgotten a structural shift necessary to reclaim digital sovereignty and preserve an autonomous public sphere grounded in the lived choices of free, human subjects. The paper is structurally organized into the following analytical sections:1. Informational Remains as Political Capital: Examines the material and infrastructural reality of postmortem data generation.2. Platform Sovereignty and the Logic of Necro-Exploitation: Analyzes how global technology corporations exercise jurisdiction over digital remains outside traditional state frameworks.3. The Political Valorization of Ideological Remains and Simulacral Reanimation: Critiques the instrumentalization of the deceased's symbolic capital to deepen political polarization.4. The Right to Be Forgotten and Sovereign Expropriation: Evaluates the systemic alienation of identity and the reduction of the deceased to a "Digital Homo Sacer."5. The Politics of the "Black Box": Explores the erosion of democratic accountability through corporate optimization and algorithmic mediation.6. Rethinking Representation: Deconstructs the phenomenon of "phantom representation" and informational inertia using Latourian and Deleuzian frameworks.7. Necro-Authoritarianism and Electoral Simulation: Details the manifestation of digital sovereignty through the perpetuation of digital ghosts.8. Reconstructing Digital Sovereignty: Proposes legal standards for "postmortem citizenship" and "informational inviolability."9. Algorithmic Accountability and the Political Right to Be Forgotten: Outlines an framework for "informational ecology" as a condition for democratic renewal.

Keywords

digital immortality, necropolitics, informational body, electoral simulation, right to be forgotten, algorithmic governance, political theory, necro-authoritarianism, platform sovereignty

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green