
TOPO-2026: The Cognitive Phase Diagram — Full Summary Document Overview Title: TOPO-2026: The Cognitive Phase Diagram — Mapping the Stability-Plasticity Landscape of Biological and Artificial Learning Author: Frank Morales Aguilera, BEng, MEng, SMIEEE Affiliation: Sovereign Machine Lab (SOMALA), Montréal, Canada Date: June 2026 Deterministic Seed: 1231 Executive Summary This paper introduces a framework that resolves the 35-year-old catastrophic forgetting problem, reclassifying it from a computational "bug" into a manageable feature of the stability-plasticity trade-off. It identifies that biological learning operates across five distinct "gears." The Core Discovery: Solving Catastrophic Forgetting The research demonstrates that catastrophic forgetting can be eliminated, achieving a net improvement in backward transfer rather than data loss. Metric Result Mean Backward Transfer +1.55% Worst-Case Forgetting +3.25% Numerical Instability 0 events The Five Cognitive States The brain moves between discrete states based on the balance between stability (memory retention) and plasticity (new learning). Run Cognitive State Brain Mode 1 Elder/Expert Consolidation-dominant (sleep) 4 Healthy Adult Homeostatic balance 0 Average Default mode 3 Young/Student Encoding-dominant (wake) 2 Burnout/Overload Dysregulated stress Topological Governance The framework uses a Topological Governor, a prime-anchored embedding constraint that ensures long-term memory stability. Mathematical Foundation: Using Euler's product, six prime anchors ($2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13$) capture $97.85\%$ of all spectral weight in the embedding space. Mechanism: It utilizes hippocampal-inspired functions such as take_snapshot() for memory traces and enforce_anchors() for restoration. Learning Rate Configurations The ratio between embedding learning rates governs optimization (lr_embed) and classification learning rates (lr_cls). The research finds that optimal balance is achieved when lr_embed ≈ 2 × lr_cls. Run State Ratio Result 1 & 4 Optimal (Expert/Adult) 2.0 Stable, high retention 3 Young/Student 1.0 High plasticity, lower stability 2 Burnout 5.0 Pathological, low old-memory retention Practical Applications Education: Tailoring learning strategies to age-appropriate states (e.g., maximizing plasticity for children, stability for elders). Mental Health: Identifying patterns such as ADHD or burnout by matching cognitive performance profiles to specific "runs." AI Safety: Deploying "Safe AI" (Run 1) for safety-critical systems, or "Learning AI" (Run 3) for research environments. Certification Summary The framework passed all empirical benchmarks for stability and accuracy. Metric Result Status Task C Accuracy 92.3% PASS Combined Forgetting 1.55% PASS Anchor Memory 67.5 KB PASS Resources Model: Hugging Face Repository Code: GitHub Implementation Catastrophic forgetting is not a bug. It is a feature of the stability-plasticity trade-off. The Cognitive Phase Diagram is the map of the mind. Seed = 123. The truth is in the cloud.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
