
Machine learning's explosive growth has produced a proliferation of accelerator architectures, yet no framework maps a workload's computational character to the hardware that serves it best. We build that framework: decomposing ML workloads — transformers, CNNs, GNNs, diffusion and state-space models — into core compute primitives characterized by arithmetic intensity, memory-access pattern, and parallelism, and evaluating how GPUs, TPUs, systolic arrays, dataflow processors, wafer-scale engines, and neuromorphic chips serve them. Using hierarchical roofline and utilization modelling, we show the binding constraint has shifted from peak FLOPS to memory bandwidth and data-movement energy — which quantization only sharpens — and consolidate eight persistent, unsolved problems. These motivate the central contribution: the Fused Memory-Compute Tile (FMCT, codename Habanero), an SRAM-first, HBM-free accelerator combining a three-mode (GEMM / bandwidth / fused) phase-adaptive tile switched by compiler directive, a non-linear unit fused into the systolic datapath, compute-in-memory as a selectable mode rather than the whole architecture, and an inline KV-cache compression engine. A validated component-level energy model shows ~4-7× batch-1 efficiency gains over HBM GPUs. We position FMCT against its closest SRAM-first, no-HBM analogs — d-Matrix Corsair and Tenstorrent — and OpenAI's HBM-retaining Jalapeño ASIC, closing with principles for memory-centric, workload-adaptive accelerators.
AI accelerator, Groq, GPU, NVIDIA, HBM, Habanero, Tenstorrent, batch-1 decode, hardware, CIM, Broadcom, ML accelerator, energy efficiency, TOPS/W, OpenAI, dataflow architecture, INT8, chiplet, KV cache, UCIe, SRAM, machine learning hardware, mixture of experts, Jalapeño, KV cache compression, transformer inference, INT4, MoE, near-memory computing, processing-in-memory, architecture, chip-design, accelerator, fused memory-compute tile, compute-in-memory, context window, systolic array, TPU, phase-adaptive, d-Matrix, roofline model, RISC-V, LLM inference, ml, inference ASIC, arithmetic intensity, memory wall, FMCT, long context, HBM4, quantization, Cerebras, LPDDR5, edge inference
AI accelerator, Groq, GPU, NVIDIA, HBM, Habanero, Tenstorrent, batch-1 decode, hardware, CIM, Broadcom, ML accelerator, energy efficiency, TOPS/W, OpenAI, dataflow architecture, INT8, chiplet, KV cache, UCIe, SRAM, machine learning hardware, mixture of experts, Jalapeño, KV cache compression, transformer inference, INT4, MoE, near-memory computing, processing-in-memory, architecture, chip-design, accelerator, fused memory-compute tile, compute-in-memory, context window, systolic array, TPU, phase-adaptive, d-Matrix, roofline model, RISC-V, LLM inference, ml, inference ASIC, arithmetic intensity, memory wall, FMCT, long context, HBM4, quantization, Cerebras, LPDDR5, edge inference
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
