Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Press release on Re-Check's publication in BMJ-EBM (2018/12/06): Riva C, Tinari S, Spinosa JP. Lessons learnt on transparency, scientific process and publication ethics. The short story of a long journey to get into the public domain unpublished data, methodological flaws and bias of the Cochrane HPV vaccines review. BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine Published Online First: 06 December 2018. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2018-111119
Evidence-based medicine, Flaws, Cochrane review, Methodolology, Conflicts of interest, Post-hoc subgroup analyses, HPV vaccines
Evidence-based medicine, Flaws, Cochrane review, Methodolology, Conflicts of interest, Post-hoc subgroup analyses, HPV vaccines
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 7 | |
| downloads | 2 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts