Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Rethinking Customer Loyalty in the Digital Era: Personalization, Emotional Attachment, and the Limits of Reward-Based Programs

Authors: Mahdi Amirkhani1*, Sanam Sabooni2;

Rethinking Customer Loyalty in the Digital Era: Personalization, Emotional Attachment, and the Limits of Reward-Based Programs

Abstract

This paper offers an integrative review of how customer loyalty is conceptualized, cultivated, and measured under conditions of digital saturation. It argues that the dominant managerial reflex of stacking points and discounts rests on an outdated, transaction-centred view of loyalty that recent evidence no longer supports. Synthesizing two large meta-analyses and the foundational conceptual literature, the paper distinguishes behavioral from attitudinal loyalty and shows that affective and relational drivers, rather than cognitive incentives such as price and assortment, increasingly account for durable loyalty, particularly in online and hedonic contexts. It then examines personalization as the principal mechanism through which firms attempt to convert data into attachment, and identifies the personalization–privacy paradox as the central tension constraining that strategy. Four widely cited programs are analysed as contrasting archetypes to illustrate how technology, emotion, and value interact in practice. The paper closes by setting out the unresolved tensions, selection effects in program evaluation, the fragility of self-reported metrics, and the ethics of data use, and proposes an agenda for future research. The contribution is conceptual: a consolidated account of why loyalty has shifted from what customers do to how they feel.

Keywords

customer loyalty; emotional loyalty; personalization; loyalty programs; brand attachment; customer engagement; data privacy; digital marketing

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average