Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Beyond staffing shortages: Supervisory and interpersonal factors driving occupational stress among nurses in tertiary hospitals in Delta State

Authors: Ngozi Eucharia Makata1*, Ufuoma Ann Obukohwo2, John Emenike Anieche3, Ifeoma Helen Obidife4 and Osuonlale John. Makanjuola5;

Beyond staffing shortages: Supervisory and interpersonal factors driving occupational stress among nurses in tertiary hospitals in Delta State

Abstract

Background: Occupational stress among nurses is commonly linked to staffing shortages and excessive workloads. However, emerging evidence suggests that workplace relationships, particularly with supervisors, physicians, patients, and families, may exert an equally significant, if not greater, influence on nurses’ well-being. Aim: This study investigated whether supervisory and interpersonal stressors outweigh workload-related factors as drivers of occupational stress among nurses in tertiary hospitals and identified demographic factors associated with stress within the Demand–Control–Support framework. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional survey was conducted among registered nurses in two tertiary hospitals in Delta State, Nigeria. From a population of 714 nurses, 259 with at least two years of clinical experience were selected using a stratified sampling technique. Occupational stress was assessed using the 50-item Expanded Nursing Stress Scale (ENSS), comprising eight stress domains rated on a four-point Likert scale. Domain rankings were based on mean scores, while differences across demographic groups were examined using Mann–Whitney U and Kruskal–Wallis tests at a significance level of p < .05. Results: Nearly two-thirds (65.4%) of participants reported moderate-to-severe stress. Problems with supervisors (M = 3.30) emerged as the highest stressor, followed by patient and family interactions (M = 3.20), both exceeding workload-related stress (M = 3.17). Age significantly influenced stress levels (H = 16.684, p = .001), with nurses aged 21–30 years reporting the highest stress. Years of experience also showed a significant effect (H = 8.002, p = .020), with less experienced nurses reporting greater stress. Gender and marital status were not significant predictors. Conclusion: Supervisory and interpersonal stressors surpassed workload as the primary sources of occupational stress. Findings support the Demand–Control–Support model and highlight the need for interventions that strengthen supervisory support, improve workplace relationships, and support early-career nurses alongside staffing improvements.

Keywords

Occupational stress; Supervisory support; Interpersonal conflict; Demand–Control–Support model; Expanded Nursing Stress Scale

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average