
doi: 10.5281/zenodo.20737802 , 10.5281/zenodo.21247153 , 10.5281/zenodo.21261798 , 10.5281/zenodo.21223337 , 10.5281/zenodo.21324724 , 10.5281/zenodo.21311971 , 10.5281/zenodo.21324723 , 10.5281/zenodo.21252605 , 10.5281/zenodo.20737801 , 10.5281/zenodo.20779775 , 10.5281/zenodo.21261799 , 10.5281/zenodo.21068094 , 10.5281/zenodo.21217480 , 10.5281/zenodo.21311970 , 10.5281/zenodo.21217479 , 10.5281/zenodo.21252604 , 10.5281/zenodo.21247154 , 10.5281/zenodo.21024894 , 10.5281/zenodo.20779776 , 10.5281/zenodo.21068093 , 10.5281/zenodo.21223336 , 10.5281/zenodo.21024895
doi: 10.5281/zenodo.20737802 , 10.5281/zenodo.21247153 , 10.5281/zenodo.21261798 , 10.5281/zenodo.21223337 , 10.5281/zenodo.21324724 , 10.5281/zenodo.21311971 , 10.5281/zenodo.21324723 , 10.5281/zenodo.21252605 , 10.5281/zenodo.20737801 , 10.5281/zenodo.20779775 , 10.5281/zenodo.21261799 , 10.5281/zenodo.21068094 , 10.5281/zenodo.21217480 , 10.5281/zenodo.21311970 , 10.5281/zenodo.21217479 , 10.5281/zenodo.21252604 , 10.5281/zenodo.21247154 , 10.5281/zenodo.21024894 , 10.5281/zenodo.20779776 , 10.5281/zenodo.21068093 , 10.5281/zenodo.21223336 , 10.5281/zenodo.21024895
Intermediate-task training---fine-tuning a pretrained model on an intermediate task before fine-tuning again on the target task---often improves model performance substantially on language understanding tasks in monolingual English settings. We investigate whether English intermediate-task training is still helpful on non-English target tasks. Using nine intermediate language-understanding tasks, we evaluate intermediate-task transfer in a zero-shot cross-lingual setting on the XTREME benchmark. We see large improvements from intermediate training on the BUCC and Tatoeba sentence retrieval tas Research goal: To what extent does the choice of intermediate task difficulty (e.g., complexity, task type) affect zero-shot cross-lingual transfer performance on XTREME-R? Autonomous synthesis report generated by Assignee Research. Tribunal consensus score: 9.1/10.
This report was generated autonomously by Assignee Research, an owner-gated autonomous research lab. The content synthesizes findings from peer-reviewed papers. Tribunal score: 9.1/10.
accuracy, difficulty, task, XNLI, required, easy, type, intermediate-task, diversity, zero-shot, extent, English, affect, hard, intermediate, measured, impact, reasoning, cross-lingual, BoolQ, tasks, complexity, linguistic, choice
accuracy, difficulty, task, XNLI, required, easy, type, intermediate-task, diversity, zero-shot, extent, English, affect, hard, intermediate, measured, impact, reasoning, cross-lingual, BoolQ, tasks, complexity, linguistic, choice
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
