
Abstract Over the past two decades, Nigeria has elevated social investment to a central pillar of its development strategy, committing substantial public resources to poverty reduction, human capital formation and social protection. Despite the scale and visibility of initiatives such as the National Social Investment Programme (NSIP), poverty incidence, inequality and vulnerability remain persistently high. This paper interrogates the paradox of expansive social investment with limited developmental returns. Drawing on capability theory, institutional economics, political economy perspectives and law-and-development analysis, the study argues that Nigeria’s social investment outcomes are constrained not only by weak policy design but also by gaps in legal accountability, institutional coordination, statutory enforcement, rights-based participation, transparent governance and policy learning. Using a qualitative, desk-based analytical approach grounded in official data, legal materials and global development scholarship, the paper demonstrates that scale without legally supported systems produces visibility rather than impact. The paper concludes that for social investment to become transformative rather than performative, Nigeria must embed social programmes within strong institutions, evidence-based design, enforceable accountability mechanisms, rights-sensitive implementation and long-term policy coherence.
Governance, Law and development, Constitutional accountability, Public policy, Social investment, Nigeria, Public Policy, Clinical Governance
Governance, Law and development, Constitutional accountability, Public policy, Social investment, Nigeria, Public Policy, Clinical Governance
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
