
This paper presents Deterministic bounded AutoResearch for a small MNIST neural-network task, a public template exemplar that turns an AutoResearch loop into ordinary reproducible research infrastructure. The case study is intentionally small but concrete: 2000 training and 500 test images from MNIST handwritten digit database are evaluated by the bounded small MNIST neural-network classification loop. The run evaluates 4 of 5 proposed candidates, including Tiny patch-attention classifier, selects exp-mlp-tanh-64 (MLP, 50890 parameters), and improves test_accuracy from 82.6% to 89.4% (6.8% absolute change). The validated diagnostic layer reports macro F1 89.4%, bootstrap accuracy interval 86.4% to 92.0%, Brier score 0.161, negative log likelihood 0.361, top-2 accuracy 95.6%, and exact McNemar p-value 0.000. The same pipeline writes proposal, candidate, run, review, benchmark, evidence, figure, confusion-matrix, statistical-summary, probability-quality, and security-integrity artifacts from declared output contracts; uses 0 LLM calls at USD 0.00 cost; and records 7 configured stages, 6 supported local-artifact claims, and 78 required artifacts. The local security attestation status is passed, with 0 checksum mismatch(es). The final readiness status is passed, with review gates deferred to a human rather than self-approved by the generated run. --- Associated artifacts GitHub release: v0.3.2 (https://github.com/docxology/template_autoresearch_project/releases/tag/v0.3.2) DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20417016 Zenodo: https://zenodo.org/records/20417016 PDF SHA-256: e07b62850a1995935283d37a45c21d71fa7c4e69cdcc451c5a1ea8aee6d0c94a
autoresearch, local artifact integrity, artifact readiness, human review, reproducible research, machine learning benchmark
autoresearch, local artifact integrity, artifact readiness, human review, reproducible research, machine learning benchmark
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
