Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Report . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Report . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Whether, Why, and For Whom: A Mixed-Methods, Reproducibility-First Research Framework for Applied Computing and Cybersecurity

Authors: Palayil, Alan Biju;

Whether, Why, and For Whom: A Mixed-Methods, Reproducibility-First Research Framework for Applied Computing and Cybersecurity

Abstract

Volume 9 of 10 in the Engineering-to-Research Monograph Series. Applied computing and cybersecurity research has a methods problem that masquerades as a results problem: a model that performs well on one dataset or a defense evaluated on one testbed is too often reported as a finding when it is at best a result awaiting validation. The visible symptom is the documented reproducibility crisis; the underlying cause is insufficient research-methods rigor. This monograph synthesizes three strands of formal research training, namely quantitative statistics, research design, and qualitative inquiry, into a coherent mixed-methods, reproducibility-first framework, and argues that socio-technical problems require statistical validity to establish whether an effect is real, qualitative inquiry to establish why and for whom, design discipline to make the question answerable, and reproducibility practices to make the answer trustworthy. Grounded in regression and logistic modeling, a doctoral research-design study, and a full qualitative interview study with thematic analysis, it contributes an integrated research-methods framework, two methodological design principles, and a validation standard for the series and the author's forthcoming dissertation.The paper and figures are licensed CC BY 4.0. This work contains no confidential or proprietary employer information.

Related Organizations
Keywords

replication, validity, mixed methods, applied computing, human-centered AI, empirical research, computational social science, thematic analysis, research design, socio-technical systems, explainable AI, research methods, statistics, cybersecurity research, research methodology, regression, reproducibility, qualitative research

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average