Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report
Data sources: ZENODO
addClaim

Evaluating SALT Self-Augmentation for Zero-Shot Cross-Lingual Multimodal Transfer Versus Parallel Corpus Fine-Tuning

Authors: Assignee Research;

Evaluating SALT Self-Augmentation for Zero-Shot Cross-Lingual Multimodal Transfer Versus Parallel Corpus Fine-Tuning

Abstract

Zero-shot cross-lingual transfer is a central task in multilingual NLP, allowing models trained in languages with more sufficient training resources to generalize to other low-resource languages. Earlier efforts on this task use parallel corpora, bilingual dictionaries, or other annotated alignment data to improve cross-lingual transferability, which are typically expensive to obtain. In this paper, we propose a simple yet effective method, SALT, to improve the zero-shot cross-lingual transfer of the multilingual pretrained language models without the help of such external data. By incorporatiResearch goal: Can the self-augmentation technique SALT be effectively applied to improve zero-shot cross-lingual transfer in multimodal models, and how does it compare to fine-tuning on parallel corpora in tasks such as image-text retrieval across multiple languages?Autonomous synthesis report generated by Assignee Research. Tribunal consensus score: 7.5/10.

Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback