Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report
Data sources: ZENODO
addClaim

Scaling Hybrid Batch Training for Zero-Shot Multilingual Retrieval Across Varying Resource Levels on the MLQA Benchmark

Authors: Assignee Research;

Scaling Hybrid Batch Training for Zero-Shot Multilingual Retrieval Across Varying Resource Levels on the MLQA Benchmark

Abstract

Information retrieval across different languages is an increasingly important challenge in natural language processing. Recent approaches based on multilingual pre-trained language models have achieved remarkable success, yet they often optimize for either monolingual, cross-lingual, or multilingual retrieval performance at the expense of others. This paper proposes a novel hybrid batch training strategy to simultaneously improve zero-shot retrieval performance across monolingual, cross-lingual, and multilingual settings while mitigating language bias. The approach fine-tunes multilingual langResearch goal: What is the impact of scaling the hybrid batch training approach on zero-shot multilingual retrieval accuracy across languages with varying resource levels on the MLQA benchmark, and how does it compare to separate monolingual and cross-lingual training?Autonomous synthesis report generated by Assignee Research. Tribunal consensus score: 7.9/10.

Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback