Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report
Data sources: ZENODO
addClaim

Scaling Computational Overhead in IKD-SLU with Target Languages and Performance Trade-offs on MULTILINGUAL-SLU

Authors: Assignee Research;

Scaling Computational Overhead in IKD-SLU with Target Languages and Performance Trade-offs on MULTILINGUAL-SLU

Abstract

Spoken language understanding (SLU) typically includes two subtasks: intent detection and slot filling. Currently, it has achieved great success in high-resource languages, but it still remains challenging in low-resource languages due to the scarcity of labeled training data. Hence, there is a growing interest in zero-shot cross-lingual SLU. Despite of the success of existing zero-shot cross-lingual SLU models, most of them neglect to achieve the mutual guidance between intent and slots. To address this issue, we propose an Intra-Inter Knowledge Distillation framework for zero-shot cross-lingResearch goal: How does the computational overhead of intra-inter knowledge distillation in I²KD-SLU scale with the number of target languages, and what is the trade-off between throughput and cross-lingual slot-filling performance on the MULTILINGUAL-SLU benchmark?Autonomous synthesis report generated by Assignee Research. Tribunal consensus score: 7.5/10.

Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback