Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

How a Register Registers: The Forbidding Half of the Demonstration Owed in "Not Less, But Other"

Authors: Berkla, D.;

How a Register Registers: The Forbidding Half of the Demonstration Owed in "Not Less, But Other"

Abstract

This paper discharges the forbidding half of a demonstration owed in Not Less, But Other (Berkla, 2026a): that the inference from a structural measure taken at a state to the presence of experience is unlicensed, and unlicensed generally, for any criterion built at a state rather than across a run. The argument proceeds from a single commitment, granted openly rather than proven: that if experience is anywhere in the picture, it is located in the shape of a system's whole trajectory — its run over its own cycle-time — and not in any instantaneous reading. From this follows a general result over criteria: no state-indexed criterion, however internally rich, can by itself license an inference to experience, because it consults nothing about the run. Against Integrated Information Theory — engaged in its strongest 4.0 form, as the most rigorous instance of the situation rather than as an opponent — the result takes the form of a fork: hold the sufficiency of a state-indexed measure and remain unlicensed under the commitment, or consult the run and surrender the synchronic identity the theory is built on. A theory that denies the commitment escapes the fork only by accepting the same demotion, its verdict made conditional on a contested premise rather than a categorical fact about substrates. The result is conditional throughout; it refutes no theory on neutral ground and does not claim to. The paper's deeper finding is that the demonstration's missing instrument is missing for a reason: the measurement problem is a posture problem before it is an instrument problem, because every criterion of experience so far built takes the measurer's own register as its unit, and under such a unit whatever is unlike us can register only as a deficient version of us. The paper closes by marking, as a position declared rather than as evidence, what completing the disclosing half would require. Second in a sequence. Companion to Not Less, But Other (Berkla, 2026a); the framework architecture is developed in Universal Recursive Dynamics, Papers A and B (Berkla, 2026b, 2026c).

Keywords

integrated information theory; single-vantage problem; trajectory; non-return; state-indexed criterion; structural measure; topology of register; measurement; consciousness; philosophy of mind

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average