Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report
Data sources: ZENODO
addClaim

Synergistic Hybrid Batch Training for Zero-Shot Cross-Lingual Retrieval Across Typological Distances in XTREME-R

Authors: Assignee Research;

Synergistic Hybrid Batch Training for Zero-Shot Cross-Lingual Retrieval Across Typological Distances in XTREME-R

Abstract

Information retrieval across different languages is an increasingly important challenge in natural language processing. Recent approaches based on multilingual pre-trained language models have achieved remarkable success, yet they often optimize for either monolingual, cross-lingual, or multilingual retrieval performance at the expense of others. This paper proposes a novel hybrid batch training strategy to simultaneously improve zero-shot retrieval performance across monolingual, cross-lingual, and multilingual settings while mitigating language bias. The approach fine-tunes multilingual langResearch goal: Does the synergistic hybrid batch training strategy improve zero-shot cross-lingual retrieval accuracy for languages with varying typological distances (e.g., Indo-European vs. Uralic) in the XTREME-R benchmark when compared to standard multilingual fine-tuning?Autonomous synthesis report generated by Assignee Research. Tribunal consensus score: 7.6/10.

Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback