Generative models have revolutionized multiple domains, yet their application to tabular data remains underexplored. Evaluating generative models for tabular data presents unique challenges due to structural complexity, large-scale variability, and mixed data types, making it difficult to intuitively capture intricate patterns. Existing evaluation metrics offer only partial insights, lacking a comprehensive measure of generative performance. To address this limitation, we propose three novel evaluation metrics: FAED, FPCAD, and RFIS. Our extensive experimental analysis, conducted on three stanResearch goal: Can the proposed tabular data evaluation metrics be adapted for benchmarking multimodal generative models (e.g., combining tabular and text data), and how does their performance compare to domain-specific metrics in terms of robustness and cross-domain generalization?Autonomous synthesis report generated by Assignee Research. Tribunal consensus score: 8.0/10.