Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

D3.3: CROPS guidelines for stakeholder engagement

Authors: Moreira, Tânia; Carneiro, Sara; Caria, Matilde; Francisco, Inês;

D3.3: CROPS guidelines for stakeholder engagement

Abstract

This deliverable provides CROPS’ Guidelines for Stakeholder Engagement to support citizen science projects not only to design and implement stakeholder engagement strategies, but also to plan strategies ambitioning to upscale into broader limits. The deliverable is a result of Task 3.3 (WP3) and translates the evidence collected from multiple sources (a structured literature review (70+ sources) and CROPS empirical inputs (project mapping, two surveys and expert interviews)) into practical, context-adaptable guidance for citizen science practitioners and project coordinators. The guidelines are organised as a 5+1 step process—identify stakeholders; map and prioritise them; design engagement strategies by stakeholder group; adapt engagement for upscaling; communicate and build trust; and monitor, evaluate, and adapt—recognising that these steps are sequential in logic but iterative in practice. The guidance is structured around the quadruple helix (citizens/civil society, academia, public authorities/policymakers, and industry/SMEs) and provides tailored approaches for each group, with cross-cutting attention to inclusivity, ethics and Responsible Research and Innovation. It highlights persistent gaps observed in practice (especially inconsistent policy engagement and rare, often funding-limited industry involvement) and proposes realistic ways to build coalitions, cultivate champions, protect open data and integrity, and sustain participation beyond initial recruitment. A dedicated upscaling section addresses scaling out, up, deep and down; the growing importance of intermediaries and coordination infrastructure; and the standardisation–adaptation tension (“standardise what must be comparable, localise what must resonate”). The deliverable concludes with targeted recommendations for practitioners, funders, policymakers and researchers, and annexes with ready-to-use checklists and templates to operationalise stakeholder planning, communication and evaluation.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Citizen Science, Stakeholder Participation

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Funded by