
Abstract: This exploratory study examines the ethical viewpoints, and perspectives of faculty, staff, and students concerning Gen-erative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) technology tools at a mid-Atlantic university as of August 2023. This qualitative study is guided by Diffusion of Innovation Theory, and the Eight Key Questions Ethical Reasoning Framework, and aims to document the early reactions of the academic community to GAI's introduction into educational contexts. A university wide survey was distributed to document the perceptions, concerns, and expectations of the academic community with respect to GAI as it emerged. The results indicated a range of responses to GAI from optimism that GAI could be used to augment teaching and provide additional support to students, to concern over issues such as academic honesty, bias, privacy of data, and devaluation of authentic learning experiences. The study indicates the complexity of incorporating GAI into higher education. The study establishes a foundation for future studies on the sociotechnical implications of GAI, and includes a University GAI Ethics Guidance Checklist to assist in the ethical implementation of GAI.
Submitted: May 2025, Revision Submitted: December 2025, Accepted: December 2025
Generative Artificial Intelligence, Institutional Policy, Higher Education, Diffusion of Innovation, Ethical Considerations
Generative Artificial Intelligence, Institutional Policy, Higher Education, Diffusion of Innovation, Ethical Considerations
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
