Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report
Data sources: ZENODO
addClaim

Robustness of DPPO-Trained Diffusion Policies to Distribution Shifts in Real-World Robotic Manipulation

Authors: Assignee Research;

Robustness of DPPO-Trained Diffusion Policies to Distribution Shifts in Real-World Robotic Manipulation

Abstract

Current vision-based robotics simulation benchmarks have significantly advanced robotic manipulation research. However, robotics is fundamentally a real-world problem, and evaluation for real-world applications has lagged behind in evaluating generalist policies. In this paper, we discuss challenges and desiderata in designing benchmarks for generalist robotic manipulation policies for the goal of sim-to-real policy transfer. We propose 1) utilizing high visual-fidelity simulation for improved sim-to-real transfer, 2) evaluating policies by systematically increasing task complexity and scenariResearch goal: How robust are DPPO-trained diffusion-based policies to distribution shifts in real-world robotic manipulation scenarios, as evaluated by performance metrics on out-of-distribution test sets or sim-to-real transfer benchmarks like RoboReal or MIT Adaptation?Autonomous synthesis report generated by Assignee Research. Tribunal consensus score: 7.9/10.

Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback