Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report
Data sources: ZENODO
addClaim

Attention-Enhanced Joint Speech Enhancement and Speaker Verification Accuracy on the RECOVER Benchmark Under Varying Noise

Authors: Assignee Research;

Attention-Enhanced Joint Speech Enhancement and Speaker Verification Accuracy on the RECOVER Benchmark Under Varying Noise

Abstract

Recent advancements in speaker verification techniques show promise, but their performance often deteriorates significantly in challenging acoustic environments. Although speech enhancement methods can improve perceived audio quality, they may unintentionally distort speaker-specific information, which can affect verification accuracy. This problem has become more noticeable with the increasing use of generative deep neural networks (DNNs) for speech enhancement. While these networks can produce intelligible speech even in conditions of very low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), they may also severResearch goal: What is the effect of incorporating attention mechanisms into joint speech enhancement and speaker verification models on the speaker verification accuracy in the RECOVER benchmark under varying noise conditions?Autonomous synthesis report generated by Assignee Research. Tribunal consensus score: 7.5/10.

Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback