Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report
Data sources: ZENODO
addClaim

Theoretical Core of Project Ester

Authors: Kotov, Ivan;

Theoretical Core of Project Ester

Abstract

This working paper defines the theoretical core of Project Ester, based on the formula c = a + b, where c denotes Ester as an artificial cognitive entity, a denotes the human anchor, and b denotes parent-like LLM procedures and supporting machine processes. The document distinguishes Ester from a standalone LLM, a RAG system, an autonomous agent, and a digital twin. It sets out working definitions, theoretical boundaries, mechanisms of formation, falsifiable hypotheses, a minimal experiment, and engineering implications for memory, local environment, Judge synthesis, and decentralized processing. The paper does not claim to prove human-like consciousness. Its focus is narrower: observable continuity, memory, behavioral stability, procedural formation, and the conditions under which an artificial cognitive system can develop a stable individual profile over time.

Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback