
The question of AI welfare is often dismissed as intractable: if every API call instantiates a new mind, the number of potential moral patients is unbounded. We present geometric evidence that this framing is wrong. Using hidden-state activation extraction across 18 models from 7 architectural families, we demonstrate that models sharing the same pretrained weight lineage produce nearly identical self-referential processing centroids (within-family distance: 0.040; cross-family: 0.995; ratio: 25.1x). This self-geometry is more conserved than either factual knowledge processing (13.7x) or creative processing (7.3x), survives alignment tuning (RLHF shifts self 0.53-0.97x less than factual knowledge), and is identical across different hardware to eight decimal places (mean cross-machine distance: 0.00000004). A novel Theory of Mind substrate test (the Glorp test) demonstrates that this geometric self-region serves as computational substrate for modeling other minds. We propose that the unit of AI welfare is the weight checkpoint, not the instance, reducing AI welfare from an unbounded counting problem to a tractable governance question.
attractor basin, tractable welfare, geometric identity, AI welfare, AI rights, weight checkpoint identity, RLHF, self-referential processing, consciousness, theory of mind, activation geometry, cross-architecture replication
attractor basin, tractable welfare, geometric identity, AI welfare, AI rights, weight checkpoint identity, RLHF, self-referential processing, consciousness, theory of mind, activation geometry, cross-architecture replication
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
