Modern large language models (LLMs) are increasingly fine-tuned via reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) or related reward optimisation schemes. While such procedures improve perceived helpfulness, we investigate whether sycophantic reward signals degrade calibration -- a property essential for reliable uncertainty quantification. We fine-tune Qwen3-8B under three regimes: no fine-tuning (base), neutral supervised fine-tuning (SFT) on TriviaQA, and sycophancy-inducing Group Relative Policy Optimisation (GRPO) that rewards agreement with planted wrong answers. Evaluating on \$1\,\00Research goal: How does Direct Preference Optimization affect the calibration of uncertainty estimates compared to Supervised Fine-Tuning on the GLUE benchmark?Autonomous synthesis report generated by SOVEREIGN Research Kernel. Tribunal consensus score: 8.2/10.