Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article
Data sources: ZENODO
addClaim

GREEN BONDS VS. SUSTAINABILITYLINKED LOANS: WHICH WORKS FOR INDUSTRIAL DECARBONISATION?

Authors: Ataxanov Umidbek Olimovich;

GREEN BONDS VS. SUSTAINABILITYLINKED LOANS: WHICH WORKS FOR INDUSTRIAL DECARBONISATION?

Abstract

Green bonds and sustainability-linked loans (SLLs) are the two main instruments for financingindustrial emission reductions. This paper compares them using 2024–2026 market data, a BIS study, andacademic research. Green bonds reduce Scope 1 emissions by 21% within one year of issuance [1]. Studiesshow no average emission improvement for SLLs [9]. SLL issuance peaked at USD 158 billion in Q4 2024 andthen declined sharply, while green bonds reached USD 683 billion in the first nine months of 2025 [4]. A newerinstrument, transition bonds, increased from USD 21 billion in 2024 to a forecasted USD 40 billion in 2026 [2].Green bonds are effective but inflexible. SLLs are flexible but lack credibility unless KPIs are strict and verified.Policy measures should address verification gaps.

Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback