Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Conference object
Data sources: ZENODO
addClaim

Dal markup all'interpretazione: interrogare il linguaggio della critica verista in un corpus XML/TEI

Authors: Mazzagufo, Laura; Bruno, Denise; Cristofaro, Salvatore; DI SILVESTRO, Antonio; SPAMPINATO, DARIA; Zappalà, Giuseppe;

Dal markup all'interpretazione: interrogare il linguaggio della critica verista in un corpus XML/TEI

Abstract

Verbum is a thematic lexicon-repertoire of Verist critical language developed within the COVerLeSS project through XML/TEI semantic annotation of reviews, essays, and journal articles published between 1872 and 1890. This paper describes the conceptual and formal structure of Verbum, based on the identification of types, subtypes, main words, and semantic categories, and its formalization in the OntoTerm ontology following Semantic Web paradigms. Through quantitative analysis performed with NormaTEI, the article demonstrates how term annotation enables the analysis of temporal distribution, polysemy, and conceptual density in Verist critical vocabulary. Keywords: digital scholarly editing; XML/TEI; literary critical lexicon; corpus linguistics; formal ontology

Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback