This report synthesises findings from 13 peer-reviewed papers addressing the following research question: How does confidence-calibrated fine-tuning impact pass@N accuracy on the MATH benchmark compared to standard supervised fine-tuning. 8 claims were extracted from source literature; 7 were independently verified against retrieved documents. An automated multi-reviewer quality assessment produced a score of 8.5/10. This report is a machine-generated literature synthesis and does not constitute original research.Research goal: How does confidence-calibrated fine-tuning impact pass@N accuracy on the MATH benchmark compared to standard supervised fine-tuning?Autonomous literature synthesis. Automated review score: 8.5/10. Full text and citation available at Assignee Research.