Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Preprint
Data sources: ZENODO
addClaim

Fat Tails in Indian Equity Markets: Distributional Properties of NSE50 Returns, GARCH Filtering, and Implications for Portfolio Risk Misspecification

Authors: Rajput, Samanvi;

Fat Tails in Indian Equity Markets: Distributional Properties of NSE50 Returns, GARCH Filtering, and Implications for Portfolio Risk Misspecification

Abstract

This paper conducts a comparative statistical analysis of daily log returns for the Nifty 50 index and four NSE constituent stocks (RELIANCE, HDFCBANK, ADANIENT, BAJFINANCE) over 2015–2024. The central contribution is a GARCH(1,1) residual decomposition that separates observed excess kurtosis into two structurally distinct sources: volatility clustering (removable by variance modelling) and fat-tailed innovations (irreducible). Residual excess kurtosis remains statistically significant after GARCH filtering for all series, establishing that leptokurtosis in NSE 50 returns reflects both time-varying volatility and genuinely fat-tailed innovations. The paper further introduces a tractable Misspecification Tax proxy quantifying the annualised tail-risk cost of Gaussian portfolio construction on NSE 50 data. Gaussian VaR systematically underestimates empirical 99.9% tail risk by up to 169% for high-volatility constituents. Full analysis code is included as a supplementary file.

Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback