Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article
Data sources: ZENODO
addClaim

COMPARATIVE SEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF RC BUILDINGS WITH HDRB, LRB, AND FIXED BASE SYSTEMS USING ETABS

Authors: Amrutha.L, Athira Suresh;

COMPARATIVE SEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF RC BUILDINGS WITH HDRB, LRB, AND FIXED BASE SYSTEMS USING ETABS

Abstract

AbstractThis study evaluates the seismic performance of a 10-storey RC building with fixed-base, HDRB, andLRB isolation systems using ETABS, based on IS 1893 (Part 1): 2016 and IS 456: 2000. ResponseSpectrum and Nonlinear Time History analyses showed that base isolation significantly increased thefundamental time period and reduced base shear, inter-storey drift, peak floor acceleration, and roofdisplacement. LRB exhibited slightly better seismic performance due to higher energy dissipation, whileHDRB provided smoother response behaviour. The results confirm that base isolation is an effectivemethod for improving the seismic resilience of RC buildings under Indian conditions.

Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback