Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Zero-Trust Security Architecture for AI Agent Orchestration in Cloud Environments: A Reference Design and Implementation Framework

Authors: Ashok Kumar Kanagala;

Zero-Trust Security Architecture for AI Agent Orchestration in Cloud Environments: A Reference Design and Implementation Framework

Abstract

The deployment of agentic AI systems in cloud environments introduces a fundamental security challenge: autonomous agents require broad, dynamic access to cloud resources to perform their functions, yet must be constrained to prevent unauthorized actions, privilege escalation, and cross-agent compromise. Traditional perimeter-based and role-based access control (RBAC) models are insufficient for agentic workloads because agents operate with natural language intent interfaces, invoke tools dynamically, and may execute across multiple cloud accounts and regions in ways not anticipated at deployment time. This paper presents ZT-AgentCloud (Zero-Trust Architecture for AI Agent Cloud Orchestration), a comprehensive security architecture implementing zero-trust principles specifically adapted for agentic AI systems. ZT-AgentCloud defines five architectural pillars: (1) ephemeral per-task credential provisioning, (2) intent-aware policy enforcement, (3) cryptographic agent identity with workload identity federation, (4) behavioral anomaly detection for agent actions, and (5) immutable audit logging of agent reasoning and tool invocations. We present a reference architecture with concrete implementation guidance for AWS, Google Cloud Platform, and Microsoft Azure, validated through a prototype deployment evaluated against the NIST SP 800-207 zero-trust maturity model. Our results demonstrate that ZT-AgentCloud achieves optimal zero-trust maturity (Level 3) across all five pillars while maintaining agent operational efficiency with less than 8% latency overhead.

Keywords

Ephemeral Credentials, AI Agent Security, Least Privilege, NIST SP 800-207, Agentic AI, Behavioral Anomaly Detection, IAM, Workload Identity, Zero-Trust Architecture, Cloud Security

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average