Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report
Data sources: ZENODO
addClaim

Sliding Window Attention Degradation in Mistral 7B on LongCodeEval Beyond 32k Tokens

Authors: Assignee Research;

Sliding Window Attention Degradation in Mistral 7B on LongCodeEval Beyond 32k Tokens

Abstract

This report synthesises findings from 7 peer-reviewed papers addressing the following research question: How does the accuracy of Mistral 7B with sliding window attention degrade on the LongCodeEval benchmark compared to full attention baselines when context length exceeds 32k tokens. 8 claims were extracted from source literature; 6 were independently verified against retrieved documents. An automated multi-reviewer quality assessment produced a score of 7.5/10. This report is a machine-generated literature synthesis and does not constitute original research.Research goal: How does the accuracy of Mistral 7B with sliding window attention degrade on the LongCodeEval benchmark compared to full attention baselines when context length exceeds 32k tokens?Autonomous literature synthesis. Automated review score: 7.5/10. Full text and citation available at Assignee Research.

Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback