Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report
Data sources: ZENODO
addClaim

Qwen2.5-7B vs. Llama-2-7B and Mistral-7B in Code Generation Benchmarks

Authors: Assignee Research;

Qwen2.5-7B vs. Llama-2-7B and Mistral-7B in Code Generation Benchmarks

Abstract

This report synthesises findings from 11 peer-reviewed papers addressing the following research question: How does Qwen2.5-7B perform relative to Llama-2-7B and Mistral-7B on code generation tasks in HumanEval and MBPP after normalizing for supervised fine-tuning dataset size. 12 claims were extracted from source literature; 11 were independently verified against retrieved documents. An automated multi-reviewer quality assessment produced a score of 8.2/10. This report is a machine-generated literature synthesis and does not constitute original research.Research goal: How does Qwen2.5-7B perform relative to Llama-2-7B and Mistral-7B on code generation tasks in HumanEval and MBPP after normalizing for supervised fine-tuning dataset size?Autonomous literature synthesis. Automated review score: 8.2/10. Full text and citation available at Assignee Research.

Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback