Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article
Data sources: ZENODO
addClaim

Psychological Distress in Cancer Patients: Prevalence, Clinical Manifestations, and Psychosocial Determinants — A Cross-Sectional Clinical Analysis

Authors: Fahmiya, Kadeeja;

Psychological Distress in Cancer Patients: Prevalence, Clinical Manifestations, and Psychosocial Determinants — A Cross-Sectional Clinical Analysis

Abstract

Objective: To determine the prevalence and severity of psychological distress among oncology patients in Uzbekistanand to identify the principal clinical and sociodemographic factors that modulate distress intensity.Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary oncology centre involving 120 adult patients withconfirmed malignant diagnoses. Psychological distress was assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale(HADS) and the Distress Thermometer (DT). Social support was measured via the Multidimensional Scale ofPerceived Social Support (MSPSS). Statistical analyses included Mann-Whitney U, Kruskal-Wallis, and Spearmancorrelation tests (SPSS 26.0).Results: Clinically significant distress (DT ³ 4) was identified in 64.2% of patients (mean DT 5.2 ± 2.3).HADS-defined anxiety was present in 60.8% and depression in 53.4% of participants. Advanced disease stage (StageIV vs. I–II: DT 6.8 ± 1.9 vs. 3.9 ± 2.0; p < 0.001), combined chemoradiotherapy, and low perceived social support(MSPSS < 48; r = -0.61; p < 0.001) were the strongest independent determinants of elevated distress

Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback