
High-value scientific data are often irreplaceable and essential to ongoing research operations, making robust data protection a critical responsibility for NSF-funded facilities. This guidance document outlines community-informed best practices for ensuring data availability, integrity, and recoverability through layered redundancy, geographic distribution, automated policy enforcement, and long-term preservation strategies. The report recommends maintaining multiple independent copies of critical data across distinct fault domains, distinguishing between replication, backup, and archival functions, and implementing safeguards against cyber threats, human error, and regional disasters. Additional guidance addresses infrastructure automation, integrity monitoring, edge buffering, governance, and cost sustainability. Collectively, these practices support NSF expectations for data stewardship, operational resilience, cybersecurity, and the long-term preservation and reuse of scientific data.
This project is supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation Office of Advanced Cyberinfrastructure in the Directorate for Computer Information Science under Grant #2127548.
NSF Major Facilities, Cybersecurity, Data Redundancy, Disaster Recovery, Long-Term Preservation, Data Stewardship, Data Resilience, Cyberinfrastructure, Data Availability, Research Infrastructures
NSF Major Facilities, Cybersecurity, Data Redundancy, Disaster Recovery, Long-Term Preservation, Data Stewardship, Data Resilience, Cyberinfrastructure, Data Availability, Research Infrastructures
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
