Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Preprint
Data sources: ZENODO
addClaim

热寂真空统一模型:热寂沙海与量子真空的统一假说

Authors: 李, 志豪;

热寂真空统一模型:热寂沙海与量子真空的统一假说

Abstract

热寂真空统一模型【Heat Death Vacuum Unified Model】 我此前提出了两个独立的思想实验:热寂扰动机制:一个宇宙死亡【热寂】后,它自身就是宏观的量子真空,其内禀的量子涨落有可能触发一个新宇宙的诞生。这是一个封闭宇宙的无限循环。热寂沙海法则:如果多个宇宙之间存在联通渠道,那么为了延缓自身热寂,它们之间必然形成零和掠夺关系。两个机制各自自洽,但它们的物理基底不统一:一个说“量子真空”,一个说“热寂沙海”。那么问题出现了,当我把这两个思想实验放在一起后得出一个猜想,它们会不会其实是同一个东西?

Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback