Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Audiovisual
Data sources: ZENODO
addClaim

Why High-Rises Are So Expensive to Build

Authors: Rosehill, Daniel; Gemini 3.1 (Flash); Chatterbox TTS;

Why High-Rises Are So Expensive to Build

Abstract

Episode summary: Why do high-rise residential buildings cost so much more to build than mid-rises, even though they stack identical floors on the same land? This episode breaks down the five baseline cost drivers — from wind engineering and elevator cores to fire safety codes and construction logistics — and explains why a forty-story tower can cost 60-70% more per square foot than a ten-story building. We also explore the nonlinear cost escalators that kick in at extreme heights, and whether any combination of technology or policy could ever make tall buildings the cost-efficient housing solution they seem like they should be. Show Notes High-rise residential buildings sound like they should be the most efficient way to house lots of people. Stack more floors on the same piece of land, spread the land cost across more units, and benefit from economies of scale. But the reality is the opposite: high-rises are the most expensive way to build housing per square foot, which pushes them almost exclusively into the luxury market. The problem starts with physics. Above about ten stories, wind loads — not gravity — become the dominant structural concern. Wind speed increases with height, and the forces on a building scale roughly with the square of that speed. A forty-story building doesn't face four times the wind of a ten-story building; it faces something much worse. To resist those lateral forces, fifteen to twenty-five percent of structural material in a twenty-story building exists just to fight wind, and that share grows with height. Then there are the systems that make vertical living possible. Elevators consume more and more floor area as buildings get taller — in a sixty-story tower, the core can eat up twenty-five to thirty percent of each floor plate. Fire safety requirements escalate sharply above seventy-five feet: second stairwells, pressurized stairwells, standpipe systems with powerful fire pumps, emergency generators. These add millions of dollars to a project and are non-negotiable under building codes written in response to deadly fires. Construction logistics get worse too — crew productivity drops ten to fifteen percent for every ten stories above ground, and longer construction timelines add fifteen to twenty-five percent in financing costs alone. The result is a sixty to seventy percent premium per square foot for a forty-story residential building compared to a ten-story one. That math forces developers into luxury pricing, creating a self-fulfilling cycle where high-rises are expensive because they're built as luxury towers, and nobody tries to build affordable ones. The episode explores whether this is baked into physics or just the way we currently build things. Listen online: https://myweirdprompts.com/episode/high-rise-construction-costs

Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback