Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Preprint
Data sources: ZENODO
addClaim

The Stability Standard: How Governable AI Becomes Possible Across Borders

Authors: Rocha, Alberto S.;

The Stability Standard: How Governable AI Becomes Possible Across Borders

Abstract

This manuscript formalizes the 'Stability Standard,' a governance-as-code (GaaC) architecture designed to transition high-risk AI systems from probabilistic 'black-box' opacity to deterministic, auditable consistency. Addressing the 'velocity gap' between algorithmic deployment and regulatory oversight, the Stability Standard introduces three mandatory pillars for consequential decision-making: (1) Runtime Enforcement of Normative Constraints derived from applicable anti-discrimination law, (2) Glass-Box Transparency via contemporaneous Auditable Reasoning Traces, and (3) Cryptographically Unforgeable Decision Records. By re-situating algorithmic accountability as a prerequisite for deployment rather than a retrospective remedy, the Stability Standard provides an infrastructure-level solution to the systemic alignment failures currently characterizing enterprise AI integration.

Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback