
This article presents a comparative linguistic investigation of historical vocabulary in English and Uzbek, focusing on their etymological evolution, semantic development, and cultural-contextual characteristics. It examines the diachronic trajectories of historically rooted lexical items, highlighting their typological correspondences and functional divergences. Special attention is given to lexemes preserved in national memory and reintegrated into modern language through semantic transformation. The paper explores the interplay of historical semantics, etymological inquiry, and ethnolinguistic identity from a cognitive-linguistic perspective.
etymology, historical lexicon, semantic development, diachronic analysis, linguo-culture, historical discourse units, comparative linguistics
etymology, historical lexicon, semantic development, diachronic analysis, linguo-culture, historical discourse units, comparative linguistics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
