Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

Mediating Cognitive Structure and the Ratchet Effect in AI-Inclusive Cognitive Ecosystems

Authors: Derfer, Brian; Collier, Michael;

Mediating Cognitive Structure and the Ratchet Effect in AI-Inclusive Cognitive Ecosystems

Abstract

AI systems increasingly operate as cognitive ecosystems of humans, models, tools, artifacts, verifiers, and institutions, even when they are built, evaluated, and governed primarily through model-centric frames. Drawing on distributed cognition (Hutchins, 1995a; Hollan et al., 2000) and recent work on externalization in LLM agents (Zhou et al., 2026), we argue that cognitive ecosystems provide a valuable unit of analysis for understanding and designing intelligent systems, where the key design target is mediating cognitive structure: the artifacts and arrangements through which an ecosystem carries, transforms, coordinates, preserves, or exposes task-relevant information. A trace, draft, script, research synthesis, protocol log, vision document, or test suite is mediating cognitive structure as soon as it participates in the ecosystem’s reasoning; it need not first become formal or stable. Mediating cognitive structure stabilizes through uptake — through being consumed and relied on by downstream work. It can be strengthened through deliberate acts of validation, specification, or declaration, or through repeated use alone. Embedding into surrounding workflows, toolchains, and routines is how stabilization becomes materially load-bearing. Stabilization is not a terminal or global property of an artifact; it is a scoped, gradient, and reversible status conferred by uptake. Downstream work treats some version, claim, interface, routine, or artifact as a floor for a particular use. A ratchet effect occurs when stabilized structure persists across iterations in ways such that later exploration begins from a higher baseline rather than re-deriving what has already come to rest (Tomasello, 1999; Sterelny, 2012; Henrich, 2015). This unit of analysis surfaces a design opportunity often obscured by model-centric frames: the deliberate engineering of ratchet effects.

Keywords

Human-AI collaboration, Mediating cognitive structure, Cognitive ecosystems, LLM agents, Distributed cognition, Reproducible scientific workflows, Ratchet effect

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green