
This modest piece assessed the factors influencing the emergence of ungoverned spaces in selected Northern States of Nigeria, namely Sokoto, Zamfara, Katsina, Borno, Yobe, and Niger States. The objective was to identify the key drivers of ungoverned spaces. The paper tested a null hypothesis that; there is no significant relationship between the factors and the level of insecurity. The paper was anchored on State Fragility Theory as propounded by Robert I. Rotberg, which explains how weak state capacity, loss of legitimacy, and failure to provide basic political goods create conditions for insecurity and territorial loss. A descriptive survey research design was adopted, utilizing both primary and secondary data. A sample size of 400 respondents was derived using Taro Yamane’s formula, with 370 valid responses analyzed. Data were collected through structured questionnaire and analyzed using descriptive statistics and Pearson Product Moment Correlation. The findings revealed that poor state presence, corruption, proliferation of armed groups, ethno-religious conflicts, and economic deprivation are major factors contributing to ungoverned spaces. The hypothesis test showed a strong positive relationship (r = 0.838, p < 0.05) between these factors and insecurity, leading to the rejection of the null hypothesis. The study concluded that governance deficits and socio-economic challenges are central to the persistence of ungoverned spaces. It recommended strengthening state institutions, improving resource management, and addressing poverty and unemployment to mitigate insecurity and restore effective governance in the region
Ungoverned Spaces, Insecurity, State Fragility, Governance Failure, Northern Nigeria
Ungoverned Spaces, Insecurity, State Fragility, Governance Failure, Northern Nigeria
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
