Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
addClaim

РАЗРАБОТКА, ОБОСНОВАНИЕ И КЛИНИЧЕСКАЯ АПРОБАЦИЯ ДИФФЕРЕНЦИРОВАННОГО АЛГОРИТМА ВЫБОРА МЕТОДА ПРОТЕЗНОЙ ПЛАСТИКИ ПАХОВЫХ ГРЫЖ

РАЗРАБОТКА, ОБОСНОВАНИЕ И КЛИНИЧЕСКАЯ АПРОБАЦИЯ ДИФФЕРЕНЦИРОВАННОГО АЛГОРИТМА ВЫБОРА МЕТОДА ПРОТЕЗНОЙ ПЛАСТИКИ ПАХОВЫХ ГРЫЖ

Abstract

Цель - разработать и клинически апробировать трёхуровневый дифференцированный алгоритм выбора метода операции, типа имплантата и способа фиксации при паховых грыжах. На материале 240 пациентов (основная группа n=133, группа сравнения n=107) проведён сравнительный анализ результатов лечения. Алгоритм включает: пятифакторную балльную стратификацию риска, выбор метода доступа, выбор типа сетки и фиксации. Применение алгоритма снизило частоту ранних осложнений с 22,4% до 8,3% (p=0,003), хронической послеоперационной боли - с 17,8% до 5,3% (p=0,003), рецидивов - с 11,2% до 2,3% (p=0,006). При ретроспективном анализе установлено, что 83,3% рецидивов в группе сравнения были предсказуемы и предотвратимы при применении алгоритма.

Related Organizations
Keywords

паховая грыжа, герниопластика, дифференцированный алгоритм, балльная стратификация риска, TEP, TAPP, тип сетки, хроническая послеоперационная боль, рецидив

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green