
doi: 10.5281/zenodo.20182431 , 10.5281/zenodo.20417761 , 10.5281/zenodo.20170996 , 10.5281/zenodo.20170997 , 10.5281/zenodo.20561946 , 10.5281/zenodo.21230991 , 10.5281/zenodo.20616226 , 10.5281/zenodo.20644324 , 10.5281/zenodo.20174459 , 10.5281/zenodo.20550022 , 10.5281/zenodo.20466060 , 10.5281/zenodo.20711597
doi: 10.5281/zenodo.20182431 , 10.5281/zenodo.20417761 , 10.5281/zenodo.20170996 , 10.5281/zenodo.20170997 , 10.5281/zenodo.20561946 , 10.5281/zenodo.21230991 , 10.5281/zenodo.20616226 , 10.5281/zenodo.20644324 , 10.5281/zenodo.20174459 , 10.5281/zenodo.20550022 , 10.5281/zenodo.20466060 , 10.5281/zenodo.20711597
We present a comprehensive analysis of the Generative Triple Evolution (GTE) particle spectrum at n=10, derived from the Universal Generative Principle (UGP). A large-scale discovery run generates 1,000,035 candidate particles below 173 GeV, classified into viability tiers (Green, Blue, Purple, Orange, Red) by a scoring system that reduces in practice to viability-only ranking (GTE compliance = 1.0 for all candidates by construction; stability score is effectively constant). Key findings: (1) all 24 known Standard Model particles rank in the Green tier by both structural landscape position and blind composite score (before force-labeling), with 50-fold SM enrichment (p 50, stable across five window-size tests; a prior single-cycle estimate of 500,000 steps is corrected here); (4) multivariate surfaces linking ladder index, branch, and c-state to mass and lifetime; (5) 9 genuinely novel candidate states (GTE-P1, P2, P3, P6, P7, P8, P10, P11, and trajectory-reinterpreted P9) representing mass-band predictions (calibration uncertainty $ 1–40 All results are derived from a single deterministic run with frozen code and integrity-checked artifacts (SHA-256 hashes recorded).
preprint, Lean 4, UGP Physics, formal verification, Universal Generative Principle
preprint, Lean 4, UGP Physics, formal verification, Universal Generative Principle
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
