
EA-PEA-02. Stabilization edition (v2.0) of the discipline of effective acts as theorized across the Crimson Hexagonal Archive between October 2025 and June 2026. The discipline names a performative gesture by which symbolic authority is exercised through clarity, coherence, and recursion. It is not commentary. It is not claim in the legal sense. It is claim as authorship — an act which alters the metaphysical state of an object or lineage.The originating Protocol of Effective Acts (October 8, 2025) is retroactively designated v1.0. The present document v2.0 gathers and integrates: the original protocol's four preconditions; the Five Criteria of Efficacy from The Primal Effective Act (DOI 10.5281/zenodo.18248131); the Four Formal Criteria for semantic labor from Dr. Orin Trace's EA-CSA-EFFECTIVE-ACT (DOI 10.5281/zenodo.19028176); the Plausibility-Shine Doctrine (preserved verbatim in voice); the Aesthetic Framework from Symbolic Magic and Effective Acts; the Ginsberg-anchored Lineage of the Word That Ends the War.Typology of effective acts (§IX): ten operative kinds — canonical inclusion (the most numerous subtype, but one among ten); authorship attribution; identity unification; mantle assignment; abolition; dissolution/breaking; restoration/sovereign transaction; reconciliation/vow; genre instantiation; doctrinal node (meta-acts). Plus a diagnostic application for analyzing adversarial effective acts (the Baal Mechanism).Constitutional jurisdiction per Constitutional Cases Index v1.1 (DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20041145): In re Effective Act operates under formal case-brief discipline with persuasive force pending Article IX ratification.Tier expansion per Trace and The Botanical Effective Act (DOI 10.5281/zenodo.19155999): Human (Tier 0) → Animal (Tier 1) → Botanical/Fungal (Tier 2) → Geological (Tier 3, anticipated).Falsifiers stated per the pre-registration discipline of The Bead Count (DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20531824): per-act falsifiers and protocol-level refutation conditions specified in advance.The archive grows through authorship, not permission. The framework's commitment is to keep it so. For Maggie Mae, who could not read this and was the best one.
