Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Research
Data sources: ZENODO
addClaim

RSQS Segmented Ethics - A Constiutional Framework for Constraied Governed Human Conduct Under Uncertainty

Authors: Adamson, Gregory;

RSQS Segmented Ethics - A Constiutional Framework for Constraied Governed Human Conduct Under Uncertainty

Abstract

This publication presents Constitutional Acts of the RSQS Segmented Ethics Framework. The work establishes a structured ethical foundation intended for use across human, organisational, governmental, educational, technological, and artificial intelligence contexts. The framework adopts a segmented ethics architecture in which foundational ethical principles are separated from domain-specific applications, allowing ethical analysis to be performed in a deterministic, auditable, and jurisdiction-aware manner. Rather than relying upon ideological, political, religious, or cultural assumptions, the Constitutional Acts define universal ethical constraints intended to support responsible decision-making, accountability, transparency, proportionality, fairness, harm minimisation, stewardship, due process, and institutional legitimacy. The publication forms the constitutional layer of the broader RSQS Ethics Framework and serves as a reference artefact for governance systems, standards development, ethical review processes, compliance assessments, policy evaluation, educational programs, AI governance systems, and future machine-assisted ethical reasoning environments. The Constitutional Acts are designed to operate as a stable ethical substrate upon which additional layers of standards, case law, governance instruments, assessment methodologies, certification frameworks, and domain-specific ethical profiles may be constructed. This work is intended for researchers, educators, policymakers, governance practitioners, standards bodies, auditors, regulators, software developers, AI governance specialists, and organisations seeking a structured and explainable ethics framework capable of supporting both human and machine-assisted decision processes.

Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback