This report synthesises findings from 12 peer-reviewed papers addressing the following research question: How does the memory footprint of Deepseek R1 during vulnerability analysis compare between high-complexity and low-complexity code samples in standardized evaluations. 8 claims were extracted from source literature; 7 were independently verified against retrieved documents. An automated multi-reviewer quality assessment produced a score of 7.9/10. This report is a machine-generated literature synthesis and does not constitute original research.Research goal: How does the memory footprint of Deepseek R1 during vulnerability analysis compare between high-complexity and low-complexity code samples in standardized evaluations?Autonomous literature synthesis. Automated review score: 7.9/10. Full text and citation available at Assignee Research.