This report synthesises findings from 1 peer-reviewed paper addressing the following research question: How does the F1-score of Llama3 and Codestral degrade when classifying vulnerabilities in Big-Vul samples subjected to varying levels of synthetic obfuscation compared to clean code. 8 claims were extracted from source literature; 7 were independently verified against retrieved documents. An automated multi-reviewer quality assessment produced a score of 8.3/10. This report is a machine-generated literature synthesis and does not constitute original research.Research goal: How does the F1-score of Llama3 and Codestral degrade when classifying vulnerabilities in Big-Vul samples subjected to varying levels of synthetic obfuscation compared to clean code?Autonomous literature synthesis. Automated review score: 8.3/10. Full text and citation available at Assignee Research.